HydroCharge performance

Evidence with its boundaries intact.

Every result is presented with the water source, test conditions, treated volume, evidence owner and limitation required to interpret it. A baseline report is not a treatment result. A technical expectation is not final verification.

Conditions disclosedStatus separatedReports downloadable

Evidence hierarchy

Every technical claim has a status.

AIndependently Verified

Independent laboratory or recognised third-party evidence with identifiable provenance.

BControlled Test Result

Controlled programme or partner/internal testing under recorded conditions.

CEngineering Design Basis

System engineering parameter or configuration assumption.

DTesting Target

Performance objective awaiting validation.

EField Verification Pending

Not yet demonstrated under operational field conditions.

01 / Controlled capacity program

Stage 3 fluoride capacity under recorded conditions.

These figures come from a controlled continuous-flow dataset. The supplied public source does not identify the test institution or report number; the result is therefore not labelled independent verification.

6.8mg/L

Raw-water fluoride

7.2pH ±0.2

Stage 3 inlet condition

0.22mg/L

Average outlet, 0–50,000 L

>95%

Average reduction

0–40,000 LRecorded stable-performance zone
>55,000 LService-volume signal at 0.7 mg/L
~65,000 LRecorded 1.5 mg/L breakthrough reference

Recorded conditions: continuous flow at 67 L/min, Stage 3 inlet pH 7.2 ±0.2, reported test dates 15–20 May 2025. Results remain specific to the media, configuration, water chemistry and operational conditions used. Field performance may differ.

Technical Evidence register

What exists. What it proves. What it does not.

The register below prevents documents from being used beyond their actual scope. Signed baseline analyses, technical confirmation and controlled performance data are deliberately assigned different statuses.

E-01

Smart X raw-water analysis

Embakasi North borehole · sample 22 May 2026

Independent baseline laboratory analysis
Test institution
D&S Mombasa Laboratory, Davis & Shirtliff
Report number
05/26/DNSLBMO/0824
Test type
Physiochemical water analysis
Raw water
pH 8.80; fluoride 6.8 mg/L; turbidity 1.0 NTU; TDS 424 mg/L
Volume
Laboratory sample analysis; no treatment-throughput volume
Report date
25 May 2026

Result and limitation

The report establishes the source-water challenge: pH and fluoride did not conform to the cited WHO guideline values. It does not measure HydroCharge treatment performance or treated output.

E-02

Kenya Red Cross Water Source 2 analysis

Embakasi East borehole · sample 20 January 2026

Independent baseline laboratory analysis
Test institution
Davis & Shirtliff laboratory
Report number
01/26/RO/0265R
Test type
Reverse osmosis water analysis
Raw water
pH 8.95; fluoride 6.0 mg/L; turbidity 1.6 NTU; total coliforms 10 CFU/100 mL; E. coli 3 CFU/100 mL
Volume
Laboratory sample analysis; no treatment-throughput volume
Report date
22 January 2026

Result and limitation

The report documents a source containing chemical and microbiological challenges. It is a baseline source-water report, not a HydroCharge outlet-water or removal-performance report.

E-03

pH correction and fluoride-removal confirmation

Davis & Shirtliff letter · 9 June 2026

Technical confirmation · not final verification
Issuing institution
Davis & Shirtliff · Brian Ogallo, B.Sc Industrial Chemistry Mgt
Report number
No report number stated
Water context
Elevated fluoride and high raw-water pH
Test conditions
Correct pH, contact time, flow rate and pre-treatment identified as critical
Volume
Not applicable; technical confirmation letter
Date
9 June 2026

Result and limitation

The letter confirms the technical role of Stage 2 pH correction and the expectation that Stage 3 media performs under correct conditions. It explicitly states that final verification requires laboratory testing of treated water after pH correction and Stage 3 filtration.

E-04

Stage 3 controlled capacity dataset

Continuous-flow fluoride breakthrough program · reported 15–20 May 2025

Controlled program · independent source file pending
Test institution
Not identified in the supplied public source
Report number
Not stated in the supplied public source
Raw water
Fluoride 6.8 mg/L
Conditions
67 L/min continuous flow; Stage 3 inlet pH 7.2 ±0.2; stated Ahlstrom Disruptor media
Treated volume
Capacity curve recorded through approximately 65,000 L breakthrough reference
Results
Average outlet 0.22 mg/L over 0–50,000 L; average reduction above 95% under stated conditions

Result and limitation

The dataset supports conditions-specific engineering interpretation and service-volume planning. Until a signed source report identifies the laboratory, methods, sample chain and report number, Smart X does not present it as independent laboratory verification or a universal field claim.

Request technical review ↗Public PDF withheld until provenance is complete.
E-05

Multi-contaminant challenge-test summary

Lead, copper, PFAS, E. coli and chlorine · 0–3,000 L

Laboratory summary · provenance incomplete
Test institution
Not stated in the supplied summary
Report number
Not stated in the supplied summary
Challenge water
Influent spiked with known contaminant concentrations
Methods stated
EPA 200.8; US EPA 537.1:2020; GB/T 5750.12-2023; GB/T 5750.11-2023
Treated volume
Start-up, 1,500 L and 3,000 L sampling points
Summary results
Lead >99.3%; copper >99.9%; PFOA >96.9%; PFOS >99%; E. coli >6-log; free chlorine ~99.5%

Result and limitation

The supplied document is a performance summary without a named institution, signed laboratory report, report number or full chain-of-custody record. It remains supporting internal evidence and is not published as independent validation.

Request technical review ↗Public PDF withheld until provenance is complete.

Evidence governance

What must happen next.

  • Complete treated-water laboratory verification after Stage 2 pH correction and Stage 3 filtration.
  • Publish signed source reports with laboratory identity, report number, methods, sample chain and detection limits.
  • Separate laboratory capacity, commissioned field validation and commercial operating performance.
  • Update every public claim when field evidence changes the operating boundary.
Review evidence with Smart X ↗